Lawyers Committee

Home Calendar Action Alert Press Release Donate Contact Us Gift Shop Lawyers Committee
Contents
About Us
Projects
Job Opportunities
Probono Opportunities
Public Policy
Pubblications
Local Committees
Links
Sitemap
Search
Legal Notices
Lawyers Committee
CRLRC.org
 

In April 2003 the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, along with the law firm Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, LLP and local counsel, Paul DerOhannesian, filed a lawsuit and motion for preliminary injunctive relief in the United State District Court, Northern District of New York, on behalf of Black and Hispanic voters in Albany County, New York. The complaint alleged that the County’s redistricting plan violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in that it failed to create a fourth majority minority district even though the County’s minority population had increased substantially within the City of Albany. By maintaining the same number of majority minority districts, the County diluted the voting strength of Black and Hispanic voters and significantly impacted their ability to elect a candidate of their choice to the Albany County Legislature.

United States District Court Judge Mordue granted our motion for a preliminary injunction, declaring that the County’s redistricting plan denies minority voters an equal opportunity to participate in the political system in Albany County. Elections for Albany County Legislature were prohibited from being held under the County’s discriminatory redistricting plan.

In response to our lawsuit, the County proposed a new redistricting plan that created four majority minority districts; however, the plan is unsatisfactory to our clients for several reasons. First, the percentage of minority voters in the majority minority districts was not high enough, based on past voter turnout and voter registration rates, to create an effective majority minority district. Second, the County’s plan divided two predominantly Black neighborhoods into two different districts, thereby splitting up longstanding communities of interest.

United States Magistrate Judge Homer held a three day evidentiary hearing on the County’s remedial redistricting plan on September 8 – 10, 2003. Magistrate Judge Homer ruled that the County’s plan, although it may not be an ideal plan, does not violate the Voting Rights Act.

 

 

 

 

Voting Rights Project