Lawyers Committee

Home Calendar Action Alert Press Release Donate Contact Us Gift Shop Lawyers Committee
Contents
About Us
Projects
Job Opportunities
Probono Opportunities
Public Policy
Pubblications
Local Committees
Links
Sitemap
Search
Legal Notices
Lawyers Committee
CRLRC.org
Features

Reuters
Thursday November 15

Bipartisan U.S. Election Reform Bill Gains Steam
By Thomas Ferraro

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. House of Representatives committee on Thursday became the first congressional panel to approve bipartisan election reform legislation since last year's disputed presidential contest. By an 8-0 vote, the House Committee on Administration sent to the full House for consideration a $2.65 billion measure that would implement one of the biggest overhauls of the U.S. election system. House Speaker Dennis Hastert, an Illinois Republican, declined to say if his chamber would consider the bill before it recessed for the year next month, but vowed to bring it up as soon as possible. "The quicker we can move on it, the quicker we can start to make preparations'' for changes that will assure the nation "of good, sound elections,'' Hastert said. While federal elections have been traditionally handled and funded by states and localities, the bill would provide states with $2.25 billion over three years for new equipment and a number of other improvements.

In addition, states would be required to adopt minimum election standards, ranging from defining what constitutes a vote on various machines, to giving voters a chance to fix errors, to maintaining voter registration records. The measure would also provide $400 million to buy out and replace old punch-card voting machines, whose many problems were documented by the thousands of disputed ballots in Florida last year.

Senate Democrats Offer Own Plan
There have been dozens of election reform bills introduced since the 107th Congress convened in January, a month after the Supreme Court made Republican George W. Bush the winner of the 2000 White House contest by refusing to permit Democrat Al Gore a hand recount of the disputed Florida ballots. But only one other bill has been reported out of a committee this year, a measure backed exclusively by Democrats in the Senate and opposed by virtually all Senate Republicans.

Senate Democrats and Republicans are now seeking a compromise on the measure, which would require states to meet new election standards in return for funds to implement them. The bill approved by the House committee would establish minimum election standards, but, unlike the Senate measure, leave it up to the states to decide how to meet them. Before any bill is signed into law by Bush, both the House and Senate must approve it. A number of organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, back the Senate measure and reject the House bill as inadequate. "Ours is a bipartisan compromise that will do the job,'' said House Administration Committee Chairman Bob Ney, an Ohio Republican who crafted the bill with Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the panel's ranking Democrat. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, a Missouri Democrat, and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, a South Dakota Democrat, declined to offer an immediate assessment of the bill.

Regardless, a senior Daschle aide said, the Senate majority leader has no plans to bring any election reform bill to the floor of his chamber this year. Ney and Hoyer released a list of 38 Republican and 36 Democratic co-sponsors, and predicted House passage of the bill when it reaches the floor of their chamber. Philip Zelikow, executive director of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by former Presidents Gerald Ford, a Republican, and Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, hailed the Ney-Hoyer bill. Zelikow said the measure contained virtually all the recommendations offered by the commission in a report in August. At the time, Bush embraced those recommendations as the ''principles that should guide us.'' While the Ney-Hoyer bill drew plenty of support, it also sparked some heated opposition headed by Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee. Conyers aimed much of his criticism at the provision permitting states to determine how they would meet specified standards.

Other critics included the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the American Association of People with Disabilities and the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. Lloyd Leonard, legislative director at the League of Women Voters, ripped into the measure, saying, "The bill contains more loopholes than safeguards.'' Ron Thornburgh, president of the National Association of Secretaries of States, which endorsed the bill Thursday, disagreed, saying, "It provides the states the flexibility they need.''

back to Election Reform Coverage

 

 

Site Meter